This policy outlines procedures and responsibilities within Harley Psychiatrists (“the Organisation “) for handling any concerns, issues or complaints that may arise.
We cannot necessarily accept responsibility for and/or handle complaints of a clinical / medical / healthcare nature, if these relate to the independent practitioners that make use of our administrative/professional services. However, in an attempt to simplify things for the service user, we will accept complaints and attempt to rectify them if they involve anything we are responsible for, and/or we will attempt to pass your complaint to the relevant independent practitioner. The complaints policy (for complaints relating to our administrative functions, which are not related to professional/medical functioning of individual practitioners) can be found below.
The purpose of this policy is to ensure that any complaints or concerns by service users are correctly managed.
Harley Psychiatrists, where possible, aspires to meet standard industry principles which include:
Everyone has the right to expect a positive experience and a good treatment outcome. In the event of concern or complaint, service users have a right to be listened to and to be treated with respect.
Harley Psychiatrists will manage complaints properly so user concerns are dealt with appropriately. Good complaint handling matters because it is an important way of ensuring our users receive the service they are entitled to expect.
Complaints are also a valuable source of feedback; they provide an audit trail and can be an early warning of failures in service delivery. When handled well, complaints provide an opportunity to improve service and reputation.
The period for making a complaint is normally:
(i) 12 months from the date on which the event which is the subject of the complaint occurred; or
(ii) 12 months from the date on which the event which is the subject of the complaint comes to the complainant’s notice.
Harley Psychiatrists has discretion to vary this time limit if appropriate. i.e. where there is good reason for not making the complaint sooner, or where it is still possible to properly investigate the complaint despite extended delay. When considering an extension to the time limit it is important to consider that the passage of time may prevent an accurate recollection of events.
Complaints may be received either verbally or in writing and will be forwarded to an appropriate manager, who must:
If the complainant does not accept the offer of a verbal discussion in an effort to resolve matters, the manager or someone designated to act on their behalf will notify the complainant in writing of the time period within which it is intended to respond to the complaint.
If a clear plan and a realistic outcome can be agreed with the complainant from the start, the issue is more likely to be resolved satisfactorily. Having a plan will help Harley Psychiatrists to respond appropriately. It also gives the person who is complaining more confidence that Harley Psychiatrists is taking their concerns seriously.
If someone makes a complaint, the person making the complaint will want to know what is being done and when. However, accurately gauging how long an issue may take to resolve can be difficult, especially if it is a complex matter involving more than one person or organisation. To help judge how long a complaint might take to resolve, it is important to:
It is good practice to review any exceptional case lasting more than six months, to ensure everything is being done to resolve it.
During the investigation, the complainant will be kept informed of progress either verbally or in writing as agreed with the complainant. The response may include:
The process of resolving the problem will include:
Complaints that are not resolved at the point of service, or that are received in writing and require follow up, are regarded as formal complaints.
If the complaint is not resolved at the point of service, staff are expected to provide the complainant with the formal complaints policy.
Our managers coordinate resolution of formal complaints in close liaison with the staff who are directly involved.
All staff will be appropriately trained to manage complaints competently.
Regular reviews are conducted by the manager to check understanding of the complaints process among our staff.
After receiving a formal complaint, a manager reviews the issues in consultation with relevant staff in order to decide what action should be taken, consistent with the risk management procedure.
Formal complaints are normally resolved by direct negotiation with the complainant, but some complaints are better resolved with the assistance of an alternative disputes resolution provider.
The manager carries out investigations of complaints to identify what happened, the underlying causes of the complaint and preventative strategies.
Information is gathered from:
Where an individual staff member has been mentioned specifically by a complainant, the matter will be investigated by the relevant manager or supervisor, who will:
The staff members will be asked to provide a factual report of the incident, identify systems issues that may have contributed to the incident and suggest possible preventive measures.
Where the investigation of a complaint results in findings and recommendations about individual staff members, the issues are addressed through the Disciplinary or other appropriate process
The manager prepares regular reports on the number and type of complaints, the outcomes of complaints, recommendations for change and any subsequent action that has been taken. The reports are provided to staff and senior management, and if appropriate, uploaded into personal portfolio for audit and appraisal.
The manager periodically prepares case studies using anonymised individual complaints to demonstrate how complaints are resolved and followed up, for the information of staff, and for use in audit and appraisal.
Information about trends in complaints and how individual complaints are resolved is routinely discussed at staff meetings and clinical review meetings as part of reflecting on the performance of the service and opportunities for improvement.
Complaints reports are considered and discussed at monthly clinical review meetings and directors’ meetings.
The manager continuously monitors the amount of time taken to resolve complaints, whether recommended changes have been acted on and whether satisfactory outcomes have been achieved.
The manager annually reviews the complaints management system to evaluate if the complaints policy is being complied with and how it measures up against best practice guidelines. As part of the evaluation, users and staff will be asked to comment on their awareness of the policy and how well it works in practice.

